![]() Müller, Heidelbergīuzzini GP (2002) La théorie des sources face au droit international general. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.Īlston P, Simma B (1992) The sources of human rights law: custom, jus cogens, and general principles. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. Permanent Court Of International Justice (PCIJ).Vienna Convention On The Law Of Treaties (VCLT).GIL has two components: the first is made by jus cogens rules the second includes rules without a precise classification, but which are legal propositions expressing genuine consensus of the international community and capable of satisfying the needs of the interpreter for flexible law-making in today’s international society. According to the author the answer is negative. Norms of jus cogens may be considered as GIL but the question remains as to whether other less prominent examples of general rules encountered in the case-law of international tribunals can be defined as GIL. In various cases where the concept of GIL has been referred to, the rule concerned did not have that broad content that principles normally have. ![]() In the same way, general principles of law cannot be equated to GIL. As far as treaties are concerned, even in cases of treaties with a very high number of ratifications, their norms cannot be considered, in technical legal terms, as GIL. 38 or it may instead constitute an autonomous category of its own. ![]() Two different approaches on GIL can be taken: GIL may, in substance, belong to one of the three classes of legal rules enumerated by Art. The role of general international law (GIL) within the system of international law sources can be discussed starting from the question of whether sources of international law are conceivable outside the realm of Art 38 of the ICJ Statute.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |